Vatican Chicanery: How Dare the Powers That Be!

Vatican Chicanery: How Dare the Powers That Be!posted on: 11/11/2004 3:21:51 AMIP: 64.219.17.250
Vatican Chicanery: How Dare the Powers That Be!Posted on October 18, 2004 at 09:43:16 PM by JaimeVatican Chicanery: How Dare the Powers That Be!Posted on October 9, 2004 at 09:01:03 PM by JaimeIt is now august 2004, Sarita Kenedy East died in 1961, Elena Suess Kenedy Died in 1984. Two wealthy widows worth between $500 million to $1 billion in a corrupt foundation ill fated from conception. The estates of these two widows has been the subject of several high powered attorney’s manipulations taking what is not theirs. This unending litigation has shown the light on the roaches hiding in the darkness of the Vatican. The beginning starts with a trappist monk who went by the name Brother Leo. Leo befriended Sarita Kenedy in a vulnerable moment after the deaths of her brother the late Power Rancher John G Kenedy Jr. and her husband Arthur East. Leo appeared one day while Sarita and elena were at the grave site of thier loved ones; how convenient. I always have wondered who set this up? Leo wisp Sarita up and away from her La Parra home; traveling throughout the world with the widow as her spiritual adviser.Sarita Kenedy East had a will dated 1948 that would become usurped during the last year of her life. Shortly after World War II, documents show, Leo was called to duty by his Trappist monastery in Spencer Massachusetts. He was directed to set aside his cobbler’s tools and dispatched “into the world” to raise funds for the order’s building program. Leo soon intersected paths with a New yorker J. Peter Grace, multimillionaire and president of W R Grace & Co., whose opulent contributions to Catholic causes have earned him a papal Knighthood and honorary degrees from numerous Catholic Universities. Grace pointed Leo to the Great State of Texas where “several wealthy Catholics might be induced to support the order’s expansion plans in the Southwest”. It seems Sarita was Leo’s only mark. Sarita was no match for the Monk who had just been released from his vows of silence along with other vows.Court Records demonstrate the chicanery involved in obtaining the “Pot Of Gold”. Brother Leo in harmony with Peter Grace and his entourage of accountant’s and attorneys advised Mrs. East with regard to her finances. In 1960, at the age of 70, Sarita made several significant technical decisions. These decisions were so intricate that she could have never executed them on her own. An account for the Trappists was opened and the artesian well where Brother Leo regularly drew funds (as much as $100000 at a time) was flowing. Grace’s recommended attorneys helped Sarita establish a charitable foundation. This was against the advise of her lifelong friend and Texas attorney Jake (the Snake) Floyd or “Vibora Seca” (Dry Snake) as George Parr referred to him. George Parr was called the Duke of Duval and was the adversary of Mr. Floyd. Parr is significant in the relationship he had with his mexican constituents, the connection to Lyndon B Johnson’s ascent to the White House, And also the GI Forum founded by Dr. Hector Garcia. This will be mentioned later on. In Sarita’s final will she left the bulk of her estate to including the majority of her half of the 400,000 acre La Parra Ranch to the new foundation. A series of six codicils would be added as a countdown to her death ensued. The codicils were the result of various interest vying for control of the Avarice. The first Codicil named the Bishop of Corpus Christi Diocese as the sole member of the foundation. The second included adding her attorney Jake Floyd and her cousin Stella Lytton as foundation members. The third codicil deleted the Bishop and installed Brother Leo, Peter Grace, and Father Patrick Peyton (“Director of the Family Rosary Crusade”. During the same year, while touring Latin America with Brother Leo, Sarita became sick. Leo flew her back to New York where she died of cancer on February 11, 1961. Only days later after Sarita died Leo materialized another document dated less than six weeks before her death. The document named Leo sole member of the foundation! Leo immediately added Peter Grace and two of his henchmen (employees) as members of the foundation. The Texas advisers were excluded. To say they were suspicious is an understatement. This move took over control of the estate. Most Reverend M. S. Garriga, then Bishop of the Corpus Christi Diocese along with others filed suit in Kenedy County Texas alleging Sarita’s last codicil was developed while she was under heavy sedation. Grace immediately called on his friends in the Vatican Hierarchy. In a sequence of letters to Francis Cardinal Spellman, Grace contended that the “church would suffer great scandal” from the ensuing litigation. “the trial will involve attempts to prove that Mrs. East and Brother Leo drank to excess” Grace warned, “ and that Brother Leo imposed his will upon Mrs. East throughout their acquaintanceship”. Furthermore, “the church stood to lose at least $50 million if the Texans won”. Grace then proceeded to fly to the Vatican on numerous occasions to gain the recognition of Vatican officials who preferred to ignore his letters. Finally the Vatican dispatched Archbishop Egidio Vagnozzi, then Apostolic Delegate to the U S, to influence a compromise between the vultures. The Texas Group and the New Yorkers could find no middle ground. Vagnozzi first suggested a resolution favoring Grace, Leo and Peyton was scoffed at by the Texans. The second proposal suggested giving control to the Texans. Grace and the New Yorkers would not hear of it. Frustrated and angered, Vagnozzi tried to leverage Grace with threats of excommunication but Grace would not back down. Again Grace demanded Vatican intervention. He claimed 80% of the foundations funds be retained by the New Yorkers. How in the hell can Texas money end up in New York City? That is like picante sauce made in New York City; like the commercial says “Made in New York City”? “Get a Rope!” Vatican Secretary of State suggested a 75% / 25% split. Pope John XXIII according to court records stated, “the pope can afford to be liberal” when he suggested a 70% / 30% split. No deal. Elle M Mintry http://Defenzor.net http://b4.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?user=defensornews http://kenedyranch.net http://b4.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?&user=kenedyranch3 http://ericvonwade.com http://ericvonwade.com/community/index.asp?board=1&board_name=General http://dannoynted1.blogspot.com/ http://forums.caller.com/cgi-bin/WebX?caller-14@@.ee6d2e3 http://captthreadsters.blogspot.com/ http://laparra.blogspot.com/
dannoynted1 Quote Reply Edit Del
Vatican Chicanery: How Dare the Powers That Be! replied on: 11/11/2004 3:23:45 AMIP: 64.219.17.250
Attorneys and Church: Do the Right ThingPosted on October 18, 2004 at 09:47:11 PM by JaimeAttorneys and Church: Do the Right ThingPosted on September 16, 2004 at 00:25:29 AM by JaimeDo the Right ThingPosted on September 12, 2004 at 01:01:32 AM by JaimeTo the ones who have the ability to concur and shut this matter down:"Lend me your ears"This litigation is only handing charity funds over to Super Lawyer.If you ignore and resist each other neither the Catholic Church (Vatican) nor the KFAT and not the Fernandez Family! I propose a theory critique it by all means.1) Attorneys out number the parties involved.2) KFAT can only bleed this litigation forever.3) KFAT can make agreements, insinuations, intimidation or easiest of all absorb (erode) the Fernandez foundation (support system).3) When the support erodes alternatives must be considered.4) Must the Fernandez family seek a "loan shark". That is a contingency with the respect to the enormous "Pot of Gold" is "ludicrus".5)Ludicrous - so absurd, ridiculous, or exaggerated as to cause or merit laughter.6) What is only 1% of $500,000,000 to 1,000,000,000. .01*500,000,000= $5,000,000. Contingency by standard is 40%. Almost half of the Fernandez family's settlement before expenses incurred.which means at least one quarter of the KFAT will be handed to "Loan Sharks"7) Then there are the KFAT attorneys fees. Which In my opinion they deserve and earned by doing thier job (DEFENDING THIER CLIENT) to the best of thier ability.8) That is about half of the existing foundation transferred to "Loan Sharks" and Attorneys.9)What about all of the money used to "buy" the Judiciary? MORE of KFAT $$$ TO LAWYERS. The rich get richer.10) Then there is the little intangibles materializing because Shannon Ratliff's (Exxon attorney & employed Loyist for KFAT) Father is Bill Ratliff (Lt. Governor of Texas). and John Vinson is the lead counsel for the intervening State Attorney General and Vinson & Vinson are the top campaign contributors to too many current Justices sitting at the Bench in Austin ( Tx Sup Ct). As are the Super Law Firms representing KFAT.11) Figure the Fernandez litigation is in remission from settlement or Biased bench. Who is still holding the cards? Vinson? Ratliff? Exxon? King Ranch?12) You are being swooped by the King Ranch. They will control.13)If the King Ranch gains more control we lose, the poor lose, the oppressed lose, the hispanic heritage loses. I dont lose to thieves. We will rewrite history correcting the legends of anglo power and blend the anglo version with the other versions suppressed.God Is Watching Over the Body of ChristElle M Mintry http://Defenzor.net http://b4.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?user=defensornews http://kenedyranch.net http://b4.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?&user=kenedyranch3 http://ericvonwade.com http://ericvonwade.com/community/index.asp?board=1&board_name=General http://dannoynted1.blogspot.com/ http://forums.caller.com/cgi-bin/WebX?caller-14@@.ee6d2e3 http://captthreadsters.blogspot.com/ http://laparra.blogspot.com/
dannoynted1 Quote Reply Edit Del
Super Lawyers: Loyalty has no price! replied on: 11/11/2004 3:29:12 AMIP: 64.219.17.250
Super Lawyers: Loyalty has no price!Posted on October 18, 2004 at 09:48:22 PM by JaimeSuper Lawyers: Loyalty has no price!Posted on September 16, 2004 at 00:28:00 AM by JaimeSuper Lawyers: Loyalty has no price!Posted on September 11, 2004 at 11:51:08 PM by JaimeI must commend the KFAT attorneys that continue to fight for thier Client. The steady advocacy for KFAT is unwavering. There is not any amount of money that can buy the loyalty these attorneys display. I must interject; to settle this dispute is not in the interest of the attorneys representing either side. Unless the Fernandez representation has forced (weasled) a contingency fee against the wishes of the family. KFAT attorneys have expediently placed KFAT money in places that (they hope) will produce the desired outcome. These guys know all the right people and all the right moves. None the less I do not use the word defeat in reference to a cause I fight for. The truth will prevail regardless of sell outs and greed. If criminal attorneys would represent clients like KFAT attorneys represent KFAT there would be much less non violent offenders, poor, oppressed, and minorities in prison. Civil litigation should not be an under the table kickback arrangement between opposing attorneys. KFAT Attorneys will never consider flip flopping even though their clients are wrong. They do not let issues like pedophilia and embezzlement stand in the path of "justice" for thier client!Elle M Mintry http://Defenzor.net http://b4.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?user=defensornews http://kenedyranch.net http://b4.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?&user=kenedyranch3 http://ericvonwade.com http://ericvonwade.com/community/index.asp?board=1&board_name=General http://dannoynted1.blogspot.com/ http://forums.caller.com/cgi-bin/WebX?caller-14@@.ee6d2e3 http://captthreadsters.blogspot.com/ http://laparra.blogspot.com/